Skip to Main Content

How to Search: Tools and Strategies for Scholarly Teaching and Research

A comprehensive guide to finding, evaluating, and reviewing academic literature for faculty and staff

Survey, Evaluate & Synthesize: Building a Strong Literature Review

Reviewing the literature is about much more than summarizing sources. A strong literature review is a critical and analytical overview of the major contributions and lines of inquiry relevant to a research question or topic. 

A good review will:

  • Map the landscape of existing research, identifying key trends, debates, theories, and gaps. 
  • Place each source in relation to other, showing how studies converge, diverge, or build on each other. 
  • Evaluate the quality, credibility, and relevance of sources, with the understanding that not all published material is equally useful. 
  • Synthesize findings and draw out the “so what”: what is known, what remains uncertain, where future research could or should go. 
  • Apply a methodical process, from surveying the literature to evaluating each item, then synthesizing, to ensure a rigorous, defensible review.

Reviewing the Literature: A Step-by-Step Guide

What "Surveying" Means

After you have collected a pool of sources using the appropriate search tools with scoped inclusion/exclusion criteria (typically a combination of platforms like the Library Search, subject-specific databases, and open search tools like Semantic Scholar or Google Scholar), you need to survey your sources to select the most useful and relevant sources. 

Surveying your sources involves performing a quick, structured scan to decide whether a source is:

  • Relevant enough to include in your review
  • Worth reading fully later
  • Useful only for background/context
  • Not suitable and can be excluded

At this stage, you are filtering what you have found to determine what you should commit time to reading in-depth. 


Survey your Sources with Skim-Reading

Skimming is strategically reading your sources to extract the key structure, purpose, and relevance before deciding whether deeper engagement is necessary.

Step What to Do Why It Matters / What You Learn
πŸ“‘ Scan Structure Look at section headings (e.g., Introduction, Methods, Findings, Discussion, Conclusion). Understand how the article is organized and whether the content aligns with your topic or assignment.
πŸ“ Read Abstract Carefully Identify the purpose, scope, methods, and major findings from the abstract. Quickly decide whether the source addresses your research question before investing more time.
βœ… Jump to the Conclusion Read the final section or final paragraph to see the author’s main claims and implications. See what the study actually found and how useful it will be for your own argument or project.
πŸ“Š Review Figures, Tables, or Charts Scan any visual elements (graphs, tables, diagrams) for patterns, trends, or key data. Get a fast sense of the evidence and how results are presented, without reading every line.
πŸ“Œ Read First Sentences of Paragraphs Focus on topic sentences in sections like the literature review, findings, or discussion. Topic sentences signal the main idea of each paragraph and help you quickly identify key themes or arguments.
βš™οΈ Glance at Methodology Confirm the study type (qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods), participants, and basic approach. Judge whether the evidence is appropriate for your research question and if you need to read methods in detail later.
πŸ”‘ Identify Key Terms or Concepts Note repeated theories, keywords, or important authors’ names as you skim. These terms can guide your later searches, help with synthesis, and show how this article fits into the wider conversation.

Evaluate your Sources for Quality & Credibility

While surveying, you should also be assessing whether sources are reliable enough to include in your review. This table provides some foundational elements to consider, depending on the specific focus of your review. 

Criterion What to Look For Questions to Ask
πŸ‘€ Authority Who wrote or produced the source, and what makes them qualified?
  • What are the author's credentials or affiliations?
  • Is the publisher reputable?
  • Is the source peer-reviewed?
🎯 Relevance Whether the content directly addresses your research question or purpose.
  • Does this source meaningfully contribute to your topic?
  • Is the focus aligned with your scope (population, setting, timeframe)?
  • Is it worth reading in full?
πŸ“… Currency/Timeliness Whether the source is up-to-date and appropriate for your research area.
  • When was it published?
  • Has the field changed since then?
  • Is newer research available on this topic?
βœ”οΈ Accuracy & Evidence The reliability and validity of claims, data, and arguments.
  • Are claims supported with citations or data?
  • Is the methodology clear and logical?
  • Does evidence match the conclusions?
βš™οΈ Methodology Alignment & Quality How the research was designed, conducted, and analyzed and whether the approach is appropriate.
  • Is the research design suitable for the question asked?
  • Are the participants, data collection, and analysis methods clearly described?
  • Are limitations acknowledged and justified?
  • Would results be replicable?
🎭 Purpose & Objectivity The motivation behind the source and whether it shows bias.
  • Why was this created, e.g. to inform, persuade, promote, entertain?
  • Is the tone neutral or biased?
  • Are alternative perspectives acknowledged?

Another approach to evaluation involves using checklists designed for the literature in specific disciplines or tailored for the design/methodology of studies:

Synthesis is the process of bringing together data from a set of included studies in order to reach conclusions about a body of evidence. The approach you should take will often depend on the topic and its disciplinary standards.